Welcome


Welcome to Committing to Chicago Mass Transit!

A few notes about the web page. The posts consist of the major components of the Legislative Action Plan:


1. Proposed Legislation
2. Fact Sheet
3. Media Release
4. Personal Contacts
5. Testimony
6. PowerPoint Presentation

These items can be more quickly accessed under the labels tab on the right side of the web page.

Below the Labels section on the right side of the page is a number of lists. These lists contain the bulk of the research done for the LAP. All of the titles are links to web pages of stakeholders, newspapers, blogs and other organizations.

If any portion of the page is not functioning properly please let me know and I can email you any information you feel is glaringly missing.

Personal Contact

Below is a copy of the email I sent to Representative Hamos and Senator Sandoval.

Rep. Hamos,

I am currently a 3rd year Law Student at Chicago Kent College of Law and enrolled in Professor William Kling's Legislative Advocacy course.

My final project for the course is to create a legislative action plan and my chosen topic is state funding related to Chicago mass transit improvements.

As the Chairman of the House Mass Transit Committee I know you are aware of the issues facing Chicago transportation and that the state legislature is looking at creating new public works legislation.

I wanted to inquire on how far along this potential legislation is; specifically if a document has been drafted.

If a draft has not been created I would be happy to create a bare bones initial draft tailored to fit your vision. Either the 10 billion dollar plan proposed by the Regional Transit Authority or something on a smaller scale. If not I would appreciate some information on the proposal and when it might be introduced.

Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you.

Respectfully,

Aaron Basch

I was unable to make contact with Senator Sandoval but I did hear back from Representative Hamos’ Office. I conducted a phone interview with her Chief of Staff Angie Lobo and a memo of that conversation follows:


Ms. Lobo began by instructing me to focus in on the RTA recommendations and their major plan titled Moving Beyond Congestion. MBC was a major study conducted by the RTA of the specific transit needs of northeast Illinois. The study concluded with a 10 billion dollar wish list of projects.

The discussion then turned to what the state legislature has already accomplished. Just recently the house had passed a mini capital bill providing a modest amount of funds for mass transit. A perpetual problem in the state has been the gross disparity in the funding between roads funding and transit funding. The mini capital bill put the ratio at 2 to 1. Traditionally the ratio has been even greater at 5 or 4 to 1.

She noted that more studies need to be conducted to decide where funds could best be used. Additionally decisions need to be made as to who manages projects and how much oversight the legislature should have.

Ms. Lobo did express so hope that a bill could be introduced later this year although it is unclear how difficult it will be to pass a bill and in what form.

In the meantime the state is actively seeking federal stimulus money for any agencies presenting shovel ready projects. To conclude she reiterated how troubling it is for the state that there has been not a single capital bill in over a decade.

Proposed Legislation

HB 1234 Transportation Allocation Act

AN ACT concerning finance.

Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, represented in the General Assembly:

An Act to revise the existing process for estimating the amount of state and federal funds to be available for transportation projects in the state, for appropriating and allocating the available funds to those projects on a local, metropolitan, and regional level and providing and initial grant of funding.
The people of the state of Illinois, represented by the state Legislature, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Short Title.

This Act shall be known and may be cited as the “Transportation Allocation Act.”

Section 2. Definitions.

(A) “Alternative transportation projects” refer to construction projects that seek to reduce traffic congestion and provide alternatives to automobile use. They include, but are not limited to, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure improvements and park and ride lots. They do not include highway maintenance construction projects.

(B) “Commission” means the State Transportation Commission:

(C) “Department” means the State Department of Transportation:

(D) “Independent transportation projects” refers to projects related to transportation that have not been considered in the context of a regional or interregional transportation plan.

(E) “Intermodal transportation” refers to use of more than one means of transport, including, but not limited to, bus, rail, park and ride lots, and pedestrian walkways.

(F) “Interregional transportation plan” is a long-term plan for transportation infrastructure, maintenance, and funding for transport between regions.

(G) “Passenger transit system” refers to any mass transit systems, like bus and rail, intended to transport people and services within regions, cities, and interregionally.

(H) “Regional planning organization” refers to any organization created to facilitate infrastructure planning within regions. They can include regional councils, planning and development councils, planning and development commissions, councils of local governments, economic development districts, and any other planning agency created with the intent of representing local, municipal, and county planning interests within a designated region.

(I) “Regional transportation plan” is a long-term plan for transportation infrastructure, maintenance, and funding for transport within a region.

(K) “Transportation capital improvements” refers to the list of capital projects for a specified programming period that are intended to reduce traffic congestion aimed at encouraging intermodal forms of transportation and achieving a coordinated and balanced regional and interregional transportation system, including, but not limited to, mass transportation, highway, railroad, maritime, bicycle, pedestrian, goods movement, highway maintenance, and aviation facilities and services.

(L) “Urbanized area” is an area, as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau, that includes one or more incorporated cities, villages, and towns that together have a minimum of 50,000 persons.

Section 3. Intent.

The Legislature of the state of Illinois declares that this Act is intended to give more control to regional planning organizations and local governments in proposing, adopting, and implementing transportation capital improvement projects, and encourages the construction and improvement of intermodal transportation projects like passenger transit systems and other alternative transportation projects. To accomplish these goals, this Act suballocates 25 percent of all available transportation funds to the State Department of Transportation and the remaining 75 percent to regional planning organizations and local governments. Additionally the Act provides $11 billion in funding over the next 5 years to support capital improvement projects.

Section 4. Findings and Purpose.

The Legislature makes the following findings:

(A) Historically, the majority of transportation funds have been dispersed to fund highway construction and improvements, with little attention paid to specific regional and local needs;

(B) State transportation funds are generally earmarked for state highway projects, while regional planning organizations, cities, and municipalities are more likely to support intermodal forms of transportation like passenger transit systems and alternative transportation projects;

(C) The Legislature desires to allocate resources directly to regional planning organizations and to increase the availability of funds for intermodal transportation;

(D) The Legislature desires to encourage the construction of passenger transit systems and transportation alternatives by making the necessary funds available to regional planning organizations; and

(E) The Legislature desires to facilitate congestion relief and infrastructure improvement at the interregional and regional level to continue to encourage future growth and make the state of Illinois competitive in the evolving world economy.

Section 5. Guidelines for the State Transportation Improvement Plan.

(A) The State Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the House Mass transit committee, the RTA and other regional planning organizations shall evaluate the state’s current guidelines for the development of the state transportation improvement program and the incorporation of projects into the state transportation improvement program and shall amend them accordingly to be consistent with the changes made by this Act.

(B) The guidelines shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:

(1) Standards for project deliverability;

(2) Standards for identifying projects and project components;

(3) Standards for cost estimating;

(4) Programming methods for increases and schedule changes; and

(5) Objective criteria for measuring system performance and cost-effectiveness of candidate projects.

(C) New proposed guidelines shall be submitted to the Commission within 180 days after passage of this Act. After conducting necessary public hearings pursuant to state law, the Commission shall adopt the guidelines within one year after passage of this Act.

(D) The guidelines shall be the complete and full statement of the policy, standards, and criteria that the Commission intends to use in selecting projects to be included in the state transportation improvement program.

Section 6. Interregional Transportation Plan.

(A) Not later than the passage of this Act, biennially thereafter, and after consulting with the regional planning organizations the Department shall submit to the Commission its interregional improvement program consisting of all of the following:

(1) Projects to improve state highways;

(2) Projects to improve passenger transit systems, including, but not limited to, other alternative transportation projects;

(3) Projects to improve interregional movement of people, vehicles, and goods; and

(4) Projects included in the interregional improvement program shall be consistent with the adopted regional transportation plan and its guidelines pursuant to Section 7 of this Act.

(B) The Department shall be responsible for adopting and implementing interregional transportation plans and shall administer funds accordingly.

Section 7. Regional Transportation Plan.

(A) In consultation with each other, regional planning organizations shall prepare and adopt a regional transportation plan directed at achieving a coordinated and balanced regional transportation system consisting of the following:

(1) Projects to create and or improve passenger transit systems and alternative transportation projects;

(2) Projects to improve local and state roadways and highways; and

(3) Projects to improve regional movement of people, vehicles, and goods.

(B) In consultation with one another, regional planning organizations shall adopt and submit, biennially, an updated regional transportation plan to the Illinois Department of Transportation. The updated plan shall be consistent with federal planning and programming requirements specified in Section 134 of Title 23 of the United States Code.

(C) After consultation with other regional and local transportation agencies, each regional planning organization, whose planning area includes a primary air carrier airport, shall, in conjunction with its preparation of an updated regional transportation plan, include an airport ground access improvement program.

(1) The program shall address the development and extension of passenger transit systems and other transportation alternatives, major arterial and highway widening and extension projects, and any other ground access improvement projects the regional planning organization deems appropriate;

(2) Highest consideration shall be given to mass transit for airport access improvement projects in the program; and

(3) If federal funds are not available to a transportation planning agency for the costs of preparing or updating an airport ground access improvement program, the agency may charge the operators of primary air carrier airports within its planning area for the direct costs of preparing and updating the program. An airport operator against whom charges are imposed pursuant to this section shall pay the amount of those charges to the transportation planning agency.

Section 8. Funding Appropriation.

(A) All funds that are available to the state for transportation capital improvement projects shall be designated and expended for the following program categories:

(1) Twenty-five percent for interregional transportation capital improvements;

(2) Seventy-five percent for regional transportation capital improvements;

(3) Not less than 40 percent of the amount of funds designated for interregional capital improvements under paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be designated for passenger transit systems and transportation alternatives; and

(4) Not less than 40 percent of the amount of funds designated for regional transportation capital improvements under paragraph (2) of this subsection shall be designated for passenger transit systems and transportation alternatives.

Section 9. Funding Use Prioritization.

(A) State transportation funds shall be programmed, budgeted, and expended to maximize the use of federal funds and shall be based on the following sequence of priorities:

(1) Transportation capital improvements that expand capacity and / or reduce congestion including passenger transit systems and transportation alternatives, but may not include highway construction projects eligible for funds under paragraph (2) of this subsection;
(2) Operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of the state highway system;

(3) Safety improvements where physical changes, other than adding additional lanes, would reduce fatalities and the number and severity of injuries; and

(4) Environmental enhancement and mitigation programs.

(B) The annual transportation budget shall align with the adopted state transportation improvement program.

(C) The budget shall not include specific appropriations for independent transportation projects and the Legislature shall not enact legislation containing independent transportation projects.

Section 10. Capital Funds

The amount of $11,000,000,000 over five years is authorized for use under the mandates of this Act for the specific purpose of promoting and assuring rapid, efficient, and safe highway, air and mass transportation for the inhabitants of the State by providing monies, including the making of grants and loans, for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, extension and improvement of transportation facilities and equipment, and for the acquisition of real property and interests in real property required or expected to be required.

Section 11. Severability.

If any provision of this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Act, which can be given effect without regard to the invalid provision or application and, to this end, the provisions of this Act are severable.

Section 12. Effective Date.

This Act shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

Mock Media Release


For Immediate Release
May 15, 2009

HAMOS ANNOUNCES PROPOSED $11 BILLION FOR INCREASE MASS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING IN THE CHICAGO METROPOLITAN AREA

CTA and Metra to receive most of the funds; adjustment made to fund allocation system.

SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS – Illinois Representative Julie Hamos from the 18th District and the chairman of the House Mass Transit Committee, today proposed House Bill 1234, a 5 year, $11 billion Transportation Allocation Act. The bill had already passed committee and now heads to the House Floor for a vote next week.

“This proposal is long overdue. The state has not a capital infrastructure investment in over a decade and will positively impact the lives of millions of Illinoisans,” said Aaron Basch, Legal Counsel for the Regional Transportation Authority. “HB 1234 is a giant step forwards in renovating our crumbling mass transportation system and improving the process with which those funds are implemented.”

Funding for projects in the Chicago Area include:
• CTA Track Replacement
• CTA Station Renovation
• Modernization of METRA Ticketing
• Purchase of Hybrid Buses for the CTA and PACE
• Expansion of CTA Rail Lines
• Increased Service Capacity
• Funding of Proposed Olympic Improvements

Additionally the Act is intended to give more control to regional planning organizations and local governments in proposing, adopting, and implementing transportation capital improvement projects.

“These adjustments to the means of allocation allow for a more efficient and effective way to disperse funds to worthy projects,” stated Rep. Hamos. “I look forward to working with local governments and the RTA in committing to Chicago mass transit.”

Testimony


TESTIMONY OF AARON D. BASCH
ON BEHALF OF THE RTA
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MASS TRANSIT COMMITTEE
HOUSE BILL 1234
MAY 1, 2009

GOOD AFTERNOON MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE, I AM AARON BASCH, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR THE REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND REGIONAL PLANNING BODY FOR THE THREE PUBLIC TRANSIT OPERATORS IN NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS. THANK YOU FOR HOLDING THIS COMMITTEE HEARING TODAY PROVIDING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO SHARE MY VIEWS ON HOUSE BILL 1234 AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.

BEFORE I BEGIN I WOULD JUST LIKE TO TAKE A MOMENT TO THANK REPRESENTATIVE HAMOS FOR HER LEADERSHIP AS CHAIRMAN OF THIS COMMITTEE AND HER EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE MASS TRANSPORTATION IN ILLINOIS.

THERE HAS BEEN ONLY ONE MAJOR CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT IN ILLINOIS IN THE LAST 20 YEARS TARGETED OF MASS TRANASPORTATION. THE MAJOR SERVICE PROVIDERS SERVING THE CHICAGO METROPOLITAN AREA ARE SUFFERING AS A RESULT.

WHILE I APPRECIATE THE RECENT EFFORTS OF THE STATE LEGISLATURE TO PASS HOUSE BILL 656, MORE NEEDS TO BE DONE. WHILE THAT BILL PROVIDED PERPETUAL BUDGET FUNDING OF SERVICE PROVIDERS, AVOIDING MAJOR SERVICE CUTS AND FARE INCREASES; IT DID LITTLE TO REMEDEY THE CRUMBLING INFRASTRUCTURE AND SYSTEMIC ISSUES THE CTA, METRA AND PACE ARE FACING.

THE CHICAGO TRANSIT SYSTEM IS THE SECOND LARGEST IN THE NATION, PROVIDING MORE THAN 2 MILLION RIDES DAILY. THE CTA, METRA AND PACE OPERATE MORE THAN 3,800 BUSES AND VANS, 2,300 TRAIN CARS, 1,490 MILES OF TRAIN TRACK AND OVER 300 RAIL STATIONS.
JUST TO MAINTAIN THE SYSTEM IN ITS CURRENT CONDITION, THE RTA AND SERVICE BOARDS SHOULD BE INVESTING AT LEAST $1 BILLION EACH YEAR. THAT AMOUNT DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY FUNDING FOR SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS OR EXPANSIONS TO THE SYSTEM.

BECAUSE FUNDING HAS NOT BEEN AVAILABLE, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS HAVE BEEN DELAYED AND REPLACEMENT OF AGING VEHICLES HAS BEEN PUT OFF. THIS RESULTS IN LESS RELIABLE SERVICE, SLOW ZONES, MORE POLLUTION AND HIGHER MAINTENANCE COSTS.

HOUSE BILL 1234 IS AN ESSENTIAL FUNDING PROGRAM TO ADDRESS THE MASS TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE IN ILLINOIS, SPECIFICALLY FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE CTA, METRA AND PACE. THE BILL WOULD PROVIDE 11 BILLION DOLLARS IN FUDNING OVER THE NEXT 5 YEARS FOR CAPITAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS.

THE FUNDS WILL BE UTILIZED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE RTA WITH OVERSIGHT BY THE ILLINOIS LEGISLATURE.

THE INVESTMENT IN CAPITAL INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS WILL ENHANCE THE RELIABILITY OF METRA SERVICE AND IMPROVE FREIGHT OPERATIONS WHILE LAYING THE GROUNDWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL HIGH-SPEED RAIL SERVICE. THE FUNDS WOULD ALSO PROVIDE FOR THE RENNOVATION OF A NUMBER OF CTA STATIONS, REPLACE DECADES OLD TRACK, AND PROVIDE FOR THE PURCHASE OF NEW TRAIN CARS. HYBRID BUSES WILL BE PROVIDED FOR BOTH CTA AND PACE USE.

COMPREHENSIVE LEGISLATION FOR LONG-TERM CAPITAL INFRASTRUCTURE COUPLED WITH REFORMS TO THE ORGANIZATION OF SERVICE PROVIDERS WILL HELP TO ACHIEVE A BETTER COORDINATED AND MORE EFFICIENT REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM.

A LARGE MAJORITY OF THE NECESSARY FUNDING WILL BE GENERATED BY AN INCREASE IN THE MOTOR FUEL TAX. THE MOTOR FUEL TAX HAS BEEN 19 CENTS A GALLON SINCE 1990. IF IT WERE ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION, IT WOULD BE ABOUT 32 CENTS. HOUSE BILL 1234 ASKS FOR INCREASE OF 9 CENTS BRINGING THE TOTAL TO 28 CENTS.

WHILE I RECOGNIZE THAT 11 BILLION DOLLARS IS A LARGE FINANCIAL COMMITMENT IN THESE ECONOMIC TIMES; IT IS NECESSARY.

TFIC WHICH IS THE TRANSPORTATION FOR ILLINOIS COALITION'S HAS RESEARCHED THE NEEDS OF THE CHICAGO TRANSIT SYSTEM EXTENSIVEVELY. A 2006 STUDY CONDUCTED BY TFIC DISCOVERED THAT ILLINOIS TRANSPORTATION PROJECT NEEDS EXCEED $23 BILLION DOLLARS. THE COALITION CONSISTS OF 70 MEMBERS SUCH AS THE AFL-CIO AND THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. THEY HAVE JOINED THE RTA IN EASING THE TOTAL REQUEST BECAUSE OF THE STATE'S BUDGET DEFICIT. YET THE PARED-DOWN FIGURE IS STILL ALMOST 8 BILLION DOLLARS MORE GOV. QUINN ALLOTTED FOR ROADS AND RAILS IN HIS CAPITAL BILL.

THE PROBLEMS WITH THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ARE A MAJOR ISSUE FOR ILLINOIS FAMILIES, COMMUNITIES, BUSSINESSES, AND POLICYMAKERS. WITH THE ECONOMY STUMBLING, ILLINOIS CAN NO LONGER AFFORD TO PUT OFF FUNDING OF MASS TRANSIT. THE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS WILL HELP TO CREATE JOBS, DECREASE CITY POLLUTION, AND IMPROVE THE COMMUTER TIMES FOR MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN ILLINOIS.

ADDITIONALLY, PASSAGE OF HB 1234 WILL ENHANCE CHICAGO’S OLYMPIC BID AND WILL IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES SHOULD CHICAGO HOST THE 2016 GAMES.
THE RTA LOOKS FORWARD TO WORKING WITH THE HOUSE MASS TRANSIT COMMITTEE TO ASSIST IN THE PASSING ON HOUSE BILL 1234 AND CONTINUING THE RENNOVATION OF CHICAGO MASS TRANSIT. THANK YOU.

Fact Sheet


Committing to Chicago Mass Transit


-Did you know that Chicago operates the second largest mass transit system in the United States and provides over 2 million rides every single day?


-Did you know that the State of Illinois has had only one capital infrastructure project in the past twenty years?


-Did you know that the Chicago Transit Authority pays the highest labor costs of any U.S transit system and needs nearly seven billion dollars to reach its full operating capacity?


-Did you know that Metra still does not have electronic ticketing reducing efficiency and lowering profits?


-Did you know that just to maintain Chicago Mass Transit in its current condition the State of Illinois need to be investing at least $1 billion each year in the system which does not even include funding service improvements?


The solutions to these problems can be addressed by House Bill 1234. Please support this much needed 10 billion dollar investment in the Chicago Mass Transit System.



PowerPoint Presentation

Committing to Chicago Mass Transit